2012/09/09

VIDEO


I have uploaded two videos at YouTube to demonstrate the benefit of using episodic/autobiographic image memory in verifying a person’s identity in cyberspace.

Episodic Memory Pictorial Password
    http://youtu.be/Q8kGNeIS2Lc  (1m40s, on a smartphone)

Mnemonic Guard: What episodic image memory can do for secure user verification
     http://youtu.be/UO_1fEp2jFo  (5m, on a PC) 

2-factor authentication and episodic/autobiographic image memory


It appears that the benefit of 2-factor authentication is broadly recognized, not the least because Onetime Passwords (OTP) can now be sent to smart phones by SMS at very low costs.  The benefit is indeed remarkable when the users are in the indoor environment.  Is the benefit the same when the users are in the outdoor environment?

What can be relied upon in a dangerous environment can be relied upon in a safe environment, but we cannot say that the reverse is also true.  I mean that the indoor environment is relatively much safer than the outdoor.

Some banks tell us that it is a “mistake” to carry a bank card together with a paper with the PIN on it. Then it should also be a mistake to carry a mobile computer, tablet or phone together with a paper with the password on it.  Replace such a paper with a token generating OTP or a phone receiving OTP, and what conclusion do you think you would reach?

The PIN/password on a paper proves the identity of the paper, not the identity of the person who holds the paper. OTP generated on a token proves the identity of the token, not the identity of the person who holds the token.  OTP received on a phone proves the identity of the phone, not the identity of the person who holds the phone.  The structure is the same in all of them.

Those banks abovementioned may be wrong in using the word “mistake”,, but we could at least learn that the 2-factor authentication in the outdoor environment is not as beneficial as in the indoor environment, and that, in the outdoor environment, what matters most is the security of remembered PIN/password rather than the reliability of a PIN/password written on a paper or a OTP generated on a token or a OTP received on a phone.

Whether or not we use OTP-generating/receiving tokens/phones, it should be imperative to enhance the remembered password itself if we want the safe cyber-life in the outdoor environment.

Making use of episodic/autobiographic image memory will help.  Sharing many of the drawbacks with textual passwords, simple pictorial password systems had been a disappointment, but those drawbacks can be overcome by the use of episodic/autobiographic memories and by offering shoulder-surfing proof functions.

Incidentally, ehancing the remembered password is not exclusive to using OTP.  It is possible to regenerate OTP from the texts randomly allocated to the pictures of episodic/autobiographic memories, and one of our alliances has already started to market such a 2-factor authentication system incorporated in a Single-Sign-On solution.